Farrsal
Financial news and analysis

Global insights for better decisions.

Economic, market and geopolitical coverage with clear context.

FarrsalNews for a Smarter Tomorrow
Financial news and analysis•3 min readPage 1 of 3

One Year After House Vote, CLARITY Act Stalls in Senate as Clock Runs Down

One year after the U.S. House passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act with a bipartisan 294–134 vote, the bill remains stuck in the Senate, with no floor vo…

Farrsal Editorial
Farrsal · News for a Smarter Tomorrow
f𝕏WAin
One Year After House Vote, CLARITY Act Stalls in Senate as Clock Runs Down
Article image: One Year After House Vote, CLARITY Act Stalls in Senate as Clock Runs Down

Article Highlights

Excerpts from the article

  • One year after the U.S. House passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act with a bipartisan 294–134 vote, the bill remains stuck in the Senate, with…
  • The CLARITY Act, formally H.R. 3633, would split oversight of digital assets between the SEC and the CFTC, drawing a line between investment-contract…
  • To reach the floor, the bill needs 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. Republicans hold 53 seats, and Senators Josh Hawley and Rand Paul are expected…

One year after the U.S. House passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act with a bipartisan 294–134 vote, the bill remains stuck in the Senate, with no floor vote scheduled and the legislative clock ticking toward the August recess. The anniversary, marked by a House field hearing in New York, underscores a widening gap between Washington’s stated support for crypto innovation and its ability to deliver a functioning regulatory framework.

The CLARITY Act, formally H.R. 3633, would split oversight of digital assets between the SEC and the CFTC, drawing a line between investment-contract assets and digital commodities. The House approved it on July 17, 2025, with 78 Democrats joining Republicans. The Senate Banking Committee advanced its own substitute version on May 14, 2026, by a 15–9 vote, with Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks voting yes. The bill has sat on the Senate Legislative Calendar as Calendar No. 423 since June 1, but no cloture motion has been filed.

To reach the floor, the bill needs 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. Republicans hold 53 seats, and Senators Josh Hawley and Rand Paul are expected to vote no. That means at least seven Democrats must cross over, yet Gallego and Alsobrooks have described their committee support as conditional, and a faction of Senate Democrats has publicly called the bill “corrupt.” The practical arithmetic requires seven to nine Democratic floor votes that do not yet exist.